Law Forums

The causal relationship between the error and the damage means that there is a direct relationship between error and harm committed by the official and the damage done to the injured. And causality is the third pillar of responsibility. Which is independent of the corner element of fault, and the verse that they may exist and there is no error. As if the latest one issued by the damage it is not considered an error and check the bear responsibility on the basis of liability, Causality here present and the error does not exist.

There may be no causal error. And marketed one of the scholars, for example: Leeds Sama one person to another and before you apply the poison in the body comes poisoned and killed a third person with a gun. Here error is poisoned, the damage is the death of the infected, but not between them as the causal death caused by the launch of the gun is not poisoned. There was no error found causation. And others cite two examples in which there is no causal error: After the sale is the buyer reveals what may be that he bought the property burdened by mortgages. Is clear from the disclosure that the property is subject. Then it is clear that this disclosure is correct and that the property is unencumbered mortgage. And take away the ownership of the property the mortgagor Here, error detection, a third party right.

The damage is the expropriation of the property. But the causality does not exist, the disclosure does not appear correct until after the sale was completed it was not the cause of the injury. And a person driving a car without a license, an injury and damage to a bystander, but the error is not the cause of the damage, but there is an error caused by a foreign patient, without error and found that there are causal.

Comments are closed.